Privatizing Social Security Will Be Gen X’s Poverty App





Proposed plans to privatize Social Security, advanced by Republicans since 2005, will guarantee that younger workers, especially those in Gen X and Gen Y generations, will pay more in fees and assume all market risk for their future retirements.

Proposals to create private investment accounts in Social Security will victimize ill-equipped investors, generate enormous fees for the mutual fund industry, and jeopardize the financial security of millions of Americans.

They will also become the victims of more sophisticated trading and marketing strategies designed to benefit investment professionals more than individual investors.

Managing risk is no joke

As explained in the book, “How 401(k) Fees Destroy Wealth and What Investors Can do To Protect Themselves,” the dangers stemming from proposals to create private investment plans will raise investment risk for unsophisticated investors over their entire working and retirement years.

Privatizing Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are the main goals of Republicans who have been pursuing the neoliberal agenda since the mid-1970s.

It is also the biggest prize Wall Street could ever imagine.

According to the Social Security Administration, in 2022, an average of 66 million Americans per month will receive a Social Security benefit, totaling over $1 trillion in benefits paid during the year. Social Security is the major source of income for most elderly Americans. So, it’s no wonder Wall Street is pushing Republicans to give them access to this pot of gold.

Pursuing Privatizations

Privatizing Social Security was first advanced by President George Bush in 2005 and later expanded upon by Representative Paul Ryan (W-Wis.) and Sen. John Sununu (R-N.H.) This topic was also the subject of a debate in 2016 between Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and Republican candidate Donald Trump.

On Oct. 16, 2018, Republican Senate Majority leader Mitch McConnell said that due to an increase in the federal budget deficit, Republicans would have to reduce and alter some of the key provisions in Social Security and Medicare.  In his announcement, McConnell said the only way to reduce the record-high federal deficit would be to cut entitlement programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security. In 2022, with Republicans poised to take control of the House, this same playbook will repeat itself.

Most recently (November 2022), Republicans again pushed the idea of cutting benefits and raising the retirement age–moves some observers think are the precursors to privatization or allowing more Wall Street investment managers early access to Social Security accounts.

Giving Wall Street Access to Social Security Accounts

Earlier proposals by Bush would have allowed workers under 55 to invest approximately half their payroll tax contributions into a private account managed by an investment manager or insurance firm. Presidential candidate Mitt Romney also supported this privatization plan.

Today, 401(k) participants pay the financial services industry about $164 million in fees daily. If privatization plans advance, this figure will increase dramatically, even as more investors get encouraged to chase investment returns or purchase expensive actively-managed, load funds.”

As described in the book, the politically partisan calls for privatizing Social Security will increase financial insecurity among investors and be part of the most significant wealth transfer in the nation’s history.

Privatizing Social Security, or allowing Wall Street investment firms to manage participant assets, will effectively expose millions of ill-equipped investors to the mutual fund industry, which aims to collect fees. There is also the reality that most fund managers have very little ability to deliver consistent, above-index market returns that would help improve their customers’ lives. That explains the sad fact that two-thirds of mutual funds fail to beat their benchmarks, according to Morningstar.

In a private Social Security account situation, millions of unsophisticated investors will be paying fees that are not readily visible, or they do not understand. For example, when investors see that a fund is charging a fee of 1%, they fail to know the cumulative impact of fees on eroding the value of investment portfolios over decades.

A General Accounting Office study found that over 20 years, each 1% paid in investment fees reduces an investor’s end return by approximately 17%. This drawdown is even worse if an investor pays their investment adviser an annual management fee of 1% and annual 401(k) fees of 1%. In this situation, an investor’s year-end return is cut by 34%.

Making Social Security Look More Like Medicare

Privatizing any aspect of Social Security into private accounts would follow the same blueprint Republicans enacted over 20 years ago when they opened Medicare to predatory private, for-profit health insurance companies. In both situations (Social Security and Medicare), millions of unsuspecting, ill-prepared average Americans would be bombarded with solicitations to pay a lot to private investment managers and healthcare companies for reduced benefits.

In Medicare, the federal government was forced o include a provision allowing private healthcare companies access to federal money via Advantage plans. Medicare Advantage plans are for-profit,  private insurance, but they have nothing to do with the Federal program, Medicare.

“Nearly from its beginning, Medicare has allowed private companies to offer plans that essentially compete with it, but they were an obscure corner of the market and didn’t take off until the Bush administration and Republicans in Congress rolled out the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003,” according to author and radio host Thom Hartmann. “This was the GOP’s (and a few corporatist Democrats’) big chances to privatize Medicare, albeit one bite at a time, finally.”

The law created Medicare Advantage plans under the Medicare Part C provision. In 2004, these plans were phased into a vehicle known as “risk-adjusted large-batch payments” to insurance companies offering Advantage plans, Hartmann explained. This system hinges on carefully selecting participants because the companies are paid on “an aggregate risk score of all their customers and, practically speaking, are paid in a massive lump sum.”

Hartmann said this system encourages Advantage plan providers to deny services to participants who may need more care while selecting healthier participants who will not need more care.

Republican efforts to erode Social Security could see the introduction of fee-heavy, privately managed accounts that would be heavily marketed to unsophisticated people in precisely the same way advertisements now bombard seniors during the Medicare open enrollment period.

In both cases, Republicans are pushing the agenda of America’s largest corporations, which want low-cost federal programs with more expensive and less effective private versions. In both cases, Republicans are promoting plans that will hurt average Americans.


The book “How 401(k) Fees Destroy Wealth and What Investors Can do To Protect Themselves” is available on Amazon. It is 287 pages, with six charts, a glossary, and 280 footnotes. ISBN 978-1477657997


Previous articleRepublicans Eye Social Security Cuts
Next articleProgressive Investor is Now Available on Substack
Chuck Epstein has managed marketing communications and public relations departments for major global financial institutions and participated in the launch of industry-changing financial products. He also has written by-lined articles for over 50 publications, five books and served as editor and publisher of nation’s first newsletter on the topic of using the PC for personal investing and trading. (“Investing Online, 1994-1999). He also is a marketing consultant, writer and speaker on topics related to investor protection and opportunities in the very dynamic cannabis industry. He has held senior-level marketing, PR and communications positions at the New York Futures Exchange, Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Lind-Waldock, Zacks Investment Research, Russell Investments and Principal Financial. He has won national awards from the Mutual Fund Education Alliance (MFEA) and his web site,, was named best small blog in 2009 by the Society of American Business Editors and Writers (SABEW).


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here